Tag Archive | whistleblower

Protected Disclosures Bill: employer to be involved

New Protected Disclosures Bill ups protection….

sent to clients 21 January……The Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Affairs will shortly be debating the recently tabled Protected Disclosures Amendment Bill which proposes a duty or responsibwhisleblower policyility on employers to explain and inform employees on the procedures for dealing with a whistle-blower’s disclosure and consequent issues surrounding.

The new Bill also makes it a clear requirement that employees should be informed by the employer that they are “entitled to exercise certain remedies if they are subjected to an occupational detriment as a result of having made protected disclosures”. Clearly, intimidation of the whistle blower is still the object of concern and still an issue.

The term “occupational detriment” is now to encompass any potential “detrimental behaviour suffered by those who previously fell outside of the scope of the Act”. It is also proposed that the definition of “disclosure” be amended.

Definition to include “workers”

An important feature of the new Bill is that the definition of a whistle-blower is also extended to in include “workers” rather than just employees. This therefore includes a person who has “worked” on the premises, i.e. to ensure that independent contractors, consultants, agents and persons working or who have worked for the State are included.

The Bill also seeks to re-define the expression “occupational detriment” to include an employee or worker being subjected to any civil claim for the alleged breach of a duty of confidentiality or a confidentiality agreement arising out of the disclosure of a criminal offence.

A clause states that if “occupational detriment derived from disclosure is proved in a court of law, employers will have to pay compensation or damages to the employee or worker.” Whistle blowers will be excused from criminal justice, it seems.

Law reform overview 

The Mlaw booksinister states in the objectives of the new The Protected Disclosures Amendment Bill, now to be debated in Parliament, that the changes emanate from the South African Law Reform Commission’s report on protected disclosures. The Bill will “empower employees to approach the court for relief in the face of detrimental behaviour shown towards them by employers” and “employees and workers will also be immune from civil and criminal liability flowing from a disclosure that reveals criminal activity.”

False whistle-blowing

However, it is to be noted that in reverse, as it were, should an employee knowingly or believing the information not to be true, disclose false information they will be guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or both.

The draft of the current Bill was published by the Minister for public comment in July last year, the purpose of the Act itself being to set down the procedure for disclosing unlawful behaviour in the workplace by both private and public sector employees and how such disclosure is to be protected.
Previous articles on category subject
Protected Disclosures Act: More whistleblower cover – ParlyReportSA

Posted in Earlier Stories, Facebook and Twitter, Justice, constitutional, LinkedIn, Special Recent Posts, Trade & Industry0 Comments

Protected Disclosures Act: More whistleblower cover

Act to cover workers and state employees…

whistleblowerWhat was expected has now arrived in the form of an amending Bill to the Protected Disclosures Act, or “Whistleblowers Act”, which will draw contract workers, independent contractors, consultants and agencies into the ambit of the legislation, as well as state employees and employers.

The draft is for public comment until mid July, such being called for by the proposers, the ministry of justice and correctional services.

In the first case, the term “independent contractors” will embrace protection for contract workers in terms of the Act together with the already described basic terminology of “employees”.   Secondly, the proposals clearly identify state employees who are working, or who have worked, for government and state utilities.

Much strengthening of the Act to protect whistleblowers is evident, including a procedure for disclosing unlawful behaviour in the workplace by both private and public sector employees and how such disclosure is to be protected.

Civil and criminal liability

The draft bill proposes that whistleblowing employees can approach the courts for relief in the face of detrimental behaviour shown towards them by employers and that they will be immune from civil and criminal liability flowing from a disclosure that reveals criminal activity. Also, the disclosure of false information by whistleblowers is to be regarded as an offence.

As a separate issue, the Bill now places upon the employer a responsibility to set up appropriate procedures for dealing with disclosures and to inform all employees and workers about such. Also there is a duty to investigate any protected disclosure. President Zuma alluded to these whistle blower safeguards in his State of Nation Address.

If occupational is proven in a court of law, then employers will then be liable for “detriment or victimisation befalling an employee” and there will exist a liability for compensation and/or damages to the employee or worker, the draft states.

Employee safeguards

The kinds of “occupational detriment” from which the whistleblower is protected is also described, such as being subjected to any disciplinary action; being dismissed, suspended, demoted, harassed or intimidated; being transferred against his or her will; being refused transfer or promotion; being subjected to a term or condition of employment or retirement which is altered, or kept altered, to his or her disadvantage; and being refused a reference, or given an adverse reference.

At the same time, the proposals define more clearly the “irregularities” described by the anchor Act to which whistle blowing can apply, these now being defined as criminal offences; failure to comply with legal obligations; miscarriages of justice; the endangerment of the health or safety of individuals; damage to the environment; and unfair discrimination.
Other articles in this category or as background
http://parlyreportsa.co.za//cabinetpresidential/logjam-has-to-be-broken-over-halted-state-information-bill/

Posted in Facebook and Twitter, Justice, constitutional, Labour, LinkedIn, Public utilities, Trade & Industry0 Comments


This website is Archival

If you want your publications as they come from Parliament please contact ParlyReportSA directly. All information on this site is posted two weeks after client alert reports sent out.

Upcoming Articles

  1. Minister Mahlobo on refinery, nuclear issues
  2. New Arbitration Bill protects SA importers
  3. Communications Bill to be tabled 2018...more
  4. Border Management Authority Bill limps on
  5. Labour: essential services, labour broking & 3 new Bills
  6. Parliament to beef up AG's powers

Earlier Editorials

Earlier Stories

  • AARTO traffic offences bill on its way

    AARTO licence demerit system studied  …. In what has been a legislative marathon, the update of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act (AARTO) has now reached a stage […]

  • Border Management Authority around the corner

    SARS role at border posts being clarified …. In adopting the Border Management Authority (BMA) Bill, Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs agreed with a wording that at all future one-stop border […]

  • Barnes prepares SAPO for SASSA

    Modernising SAPO a culture change ….. sent to clients 27 February…. Stage by stage, Mark Barnes, Group Chief Executive Officer of South African Post Office (SAPO), appears to be reforming cultures and […]

  • FICA Bill could meet new task force deadline

    OECD money task force waiting for SA   ….sent to clients Feb 7…. Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Finance, Yunus Carrim, made it quite clear in terms of parliamentary rules that […]

  • FICA Bill : Hearings on legal point

    President Zuma vs Parliament on FICA Bill …..editorial……The convoluted thinking that is taking place in South Africa to avoid the consequences of the law has once again become evident in […]