Tag Archive | Transport Laws and Related Matters Amendment Bill

SA Parliament in review

Parliament: the last session….

NA with carsLooking back on the session in Parliament just completed, probably the most important Bill to be introduced  in business terms was the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Bill – its introduction leaping the country  from the somewhat current constrained IDZ strategic plan to a much broader SEZ vision involving the whole country.

The ideas incorporated in the Bill introduce a much broader economic theory of development of the underdeveloped areas in SA by giving to business and industry incentives, rather than just develop strategically important economic nodes because of facilities provided. The new Bill from DTI is, according to most, sensible in that incorporates genuine development possibilities but in the hearings from many institutions, industry and business there seemed much differentiation on what exactly is the best way to go forward on certain issues.

In the past, the minister Rob Davies and his colleagues have never been adverse to sensible debate in Parliament (witness the withdrawal of the Licensing of Businesses Bill for serious re-drafting) and the debate continued on the SEZ Bill for some time, many changes occurring, but the Bill seems destined in its final agreed form for assent.   Interesting was insistence by Dr Rob Davies that the three NEDLAC SEZ board members be approved by him.

Drama unfolds around E-tolling Bill

The Transport Laws and Related Matters Amendment “e-Toll” Bill was finally adopted despite the considerable from the opposition on the lack of transparency at local government and provincial level on e-tolling and the implications of cost to the taxpayer and to the private transport system.

Eventually on this subject, it seems to have become obvious that somebody has to pay for new roads, one way or another, and despite the earlier furore, many academic transport institutions have now indicated their support for e-tolling as it is proposed, since this really is the only way forward.   In the end, the most pressure for the passage of the Bill came from the fact that the financial commitments for the whole exercise had to be met and the realization that the loans in place were a reality. It turned out that lack of transparency in instituting where they went was a major problem, other than cost. That was solved.

Justice catch-ups

Important in the legal world was the Judicial Matters Amendment Bill, a sort of compendium of updates that made amendments to the Magistrate’s Court Act; the Criminal Procedure Act; the Child Justice Act; the Sexual Offences and Minimum Sentencing legislation; the Attorneys Act; the Small Claims Court Act; the Judicial Service Commission Act; Promotion of Access to Information Act; the Children’s Act; and the Reform of Customary Law of Succession and Regulation of Related Matters Act. All of this is part of the judicial reform process in place in South Africa.

From a judicial aspect the Legal Practices Bill, subjected to months of debate primarily resulting from the controversial proposal to provide for the minister of justice to select appointments to the a proposed Legal Practice Council which will have power over a newly separated division between advocates and attorneys. Stalwart Dene Smuts of the Opposition faces ANC chair Luwellyn Landers in this long drawn out affair, as has become the battle with the Protection of Personal Information Bill dealt with by the same PC committee and which has seen protracted viewpoints referred now for legal opinion.

Financial clean-ups

From the aspect of being a “catch-up bill, the Financial Laws Amendment Bill on various tax and financial regulatory issues was also dealt with but important in the financial world was the tabling, before the standing committee on finance, of the Banks Amendment Bill tightening up on regulatory issues in line with global issues in mind. Hearings and submission from the public are now called for.

On finance and just before the bell rang on closure, the Insurance Laws Amendment Bill was also tabled similarly tightening-up on this financial avenue. Further financial changes in the form of new regulatory measures arrived earlier with the tabling of the Rates and Monetary Laws Amendment Bill.

DTI has a busy time

DTI introduced during the session the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill on Indigenous Knowledge and also the responses to public hearings on the B-BBEE Bill were aired, a Bill specifically introduced to eliminate fronting but which caused a storm by introducing criminalisation to the issue accompanied by serious penalties.

Minister Davies had the views of business spelt out in direct questioning from the media but the overall result was that it was quite clearly a cabinet decision that BEE in all its various legal applications was here to stay and there would be not be any form of sunset clause even considered in the near future, apartheid damage being considered by cabinet as too great and lasting in its effects.

During the last parliamentary session, DTI also introduced its next five year plan on IPAP and gave its thoughts on administered prices in the manufacturing  sector.

Also emanating from DTI and Parliament itself, was a National Credit Amendment Bill, a private member’s Bill from Dr Mario Ambrosini – now in ill health – which proposes some sensible amendments to the National Credit Act regarding unintended consequences, lesser pressure on consumer debtors to repay insofar as accumulated interest is concerned, this Bill and its parent the National Credit Act, having considerably changed the way South Africans do business, as has consumer legislation.

NEMA issues continue to dominate

From an environmental viewpoint the situation in Parliament, as always, remains dominated by the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) under which a raft of Bills remain under discussion, including the Air Quality Bill amendments, the Integrated Coastal Management amendments; and a number of generalised issues under the NEMA Second Amendment Bill. The new winter session should see conclusion of most of these issues under the control of fractious PC chairman Adv. de Lange.

The cost of Air Quality infrastructure costs has left a number in the industrial sectors particularly worried, from statements made in Parliament to various parliamentary committees, coupled as it is with the introduction of carbon tax proposals by Treasury to the standing committee on finance.

Treasury no doubt considers this committee as their sort of alma mater in Parliament, pointedly ignoring similar and simultaneous proposals that should have been made, we would have thought, to the energy and environmental committees. It appears this is to be rectified.

Nobody likes a tax proposal, says Treasury

The carbon tax proposals seem to have been conducted in the manner of shoving a cracker into a room full of people, shutting the door, and watching reaction. Many Parliamentarians, even those of the ANC, could not accept that that Treasury had suddenly gone “over the top” environmentally and treasury officials were not in fact looking for more revenue to bolster a bad balance sheet. The feeling was that “golden boy” Pravin Gordhan would probably get his way in the end, despite more watering-down on future dates of implementation.

Labour legislation came to an unsatisfactory end with the close of the last session with the contentious amendments to the LRA failing on lack of quorum in the House, a very tatty way for nearly a year of hard work to end. The Labour Relations Amendment Bill is therefore returned to portfolio committee level, whilst its tandem legislation partner, the Basic Conditions of Employment Amendment Bill, is ready for presidential assent.

Energy on the edge

Energy had an extraordinarily busy session, most of it dominated by Eskom and its problems and the somewhat hesitant introduction of independent power producers, clean energy and nuclear issues which have slowly made their way somewhat painfully into the energy mix.

Much talking on all these subjects took place in the session, with the ISMO Bill converted into a section 76 piece of legislation and therefore going to the provinces for approval. An overview report on energy generally is now awaited before the ISMO Bill proceeds any further. In essence, the body of the Bill is now complete.

The big one in mining and petroleum

Entering this period at the last moment was the knowledge that a long awaited draft Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill, containing a number of contentious proposals such as state rights and ownership in any discovered and exploited resource and particularly referring to gas. This has been published for public comment by the minister of energy affairs. The debates and initial briefing have started already.

Although debate throughout the last session hasfocused on mainly what Eskom, in its debate with NERSA over final agreed tariffs for the next five years – a debate very much involving parliamentarians – at the last minute gas exploration and its potential assumed a higher profile. With things going downhill at Medupi in the last few months, parliamentarians sensed that Eskom may not have all the answers needed for the national grid to meet its needs in even the medium term. Despite assurances to parliamentarians to the contrary, costs at Medupi continue to escalate leading to murmurs in the background that possibly Eskom may re-approach NERSA.

Presentations to parliamentarians on possibilities surrounding shale gas development indicated that any contributions from the Karoo were not likely to come into play until well after the period of the current scenario planning of five years, possibly ten, had been played out. The general feeling was expressed, however, that shale gas development would pass beyond its current exploratory phase into exploitation when measured as an economic necessity in balance against the disadvantages expressed strenuously by objectors.

Nuclear has arrived

On energy also, an amending Bill beefing up the National Nuclear Regulators office was introduced, all seemingly in a vacuum at the time since no view could be obtained from government energy policymakers on the issue of finalising the energy mix for the future. Time seemed to be slipping away. As one of her last moves before swopping ministerial portfolios with minister Ben Martins of transport, minister Dipuo Peters finally announced that nuclear energy was in the pipeline, although, like gas energy, both remain in the early development and planning stage. Parliamentarians becoming aware that the private sector is where the action will take place in this zone, as has been the case for years with the fuel refining industry.

Land reform to become big issue

Other critical issues making their entry into Parliament include the issue of land reform on the major issues of “willing buyer – willing seller´, the definitions of what exactly is meant by “in the national interest”  and the possibility of a state valuator to determine the price of the exchange.  Such proposals are coming from the ministry of public works in the form of a draft Expropriation Bill, back again in a new form for public comment. The “unlock mechanism” seems to be a state appointed valuator who will contemplate the “official market value” in some sort of effort to take the horse play out of the issue.

Meanwhile, the last session of Parliament also saw major legislation in the area of land and property with the conclusion of two Bills, the Sectional Titles Bill and the Deeds and Registries Bill which, by their names, indicate which areas they overhauled.

Finally, and almost improbably, the Spatial Land Planning Use Bill entered the fray, a Bill tackling the almost impossible odds of trying to sort out the convoluted systems of municipal and local land planning which have so the beset human settlements drive in recovering from the failed mess left by apartheid.

After nearly two years of haggling, something representing a final document for the Spatial Bill has been cobbled to together, accepted by most of the provinces, ignored by the Eastern Cape and rejected by the Western Cape since, the Bill as a section 76 proposal involving all tiers of government had had to go through debate in the provinces. Majority vote won the day but whether any of this can be got to work in the nether regions of South Africa is now the challenge.

Changes at the top

On the subject of human settlements, Tokyo Sexwale went before Parliament for his budget vote, budget votes being the main subject of the last session, and presented in a somewhat half-hearted way his housing loan scheme for lower-middle income class incomes.  In fact, the entire set of presentations from the department of human settlements seem to have fed back from Parliament to cabinet with a general “thumbs down” on performance in terms evaluation from minister Collins Chabane, resulting in that and Minister Sexwale no longer holds the portfolio.

Newspaper comment on the political aspects regard Tokyo Sexwale’s challenge at Polokwane for presidency being the reason for his departure to us would seem somewhat irrelevant.  If Sexwale and his department over the three years of his tenure had been able come up with some answers on the human settlements problem and scored success with voters, he would have been in an unmovable position. Quite clearly, minister Collins Chabane’s report on evaluation on human settlements was the equivalent of a very bad end-of-term report.

Posted in Energy0 Comments

OUTA goes to supreme court of appeal on Bill

OUTA seems to have forgotten Parliament….

The decision by the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (OUTA) to spend many hundreds of thousands of rands of public money to obtain a judgement from the North Gauteng High Court to set aside e-tolling on the basis that legislation making e-tolling possible was not debated in the proper manner seemed at the time a little odd when OUTA did not  itself  make a submission to Parliament on the legislation or accept a  debate with portfolio committee on transport when invited to do so.

The fact that the decision by the Gauteng High Court has been reversed still excludes Parliament which seems to be yet another example of living with the belief that the world ends at the Jukskei River.

OUTA seems to be unaware of the fact the Transport Laws and Related Matters Amendment Bill is a national Bill which has been tabled; the matter is a national issue and that Parliament is the home of an independent parliamentary debating process surrounding the anchor legislation, whatever inputs may come from SANRAL, OUTA, the minister of transport or threats from COSATU.

According to the records produced at a meeting of the portfolio committee on transport to finally debate and approve the Bill, the committee spent nearly R200,000 on advertising the request to “Have Your Say” on the Bill, the normal insertions for a Bill known to be contentious.  The record also shows that most of this spend was on national dailies and the weekend press, as it so happens mostly printed in Gauteng.

The scurrilous suggestion by COSATU that no such advertising took place was a lie, possibly placed by COSATU to influence OUTA, and reflects the fact that COSATU  knows full well that Parliament was the home for such debate.

That’s why COSATU was there in full strength, one of two parties who bothered to appear in Parliament.   BUSA failed to appear in person, submitting comments in writing, which kind of submission becomes a very watered-down affair.

The fact that the South African Local Government Association (SALGA) did make a full submission (and a very good one) and succeeded with an effective amendment that whenever and wherever a toll is built a full debate must take place with the municipality or local authority, was accepted by Parliament. Which seems to prove a point.

Also the Bill was re-worded to the effect that alternative routes around the affected toll road are to be demarcated. Well done SALGA.

COSATU’s own suggestion to stop e-tolling on the basis of selection against the poor with no constructive suggestions as to how national roads were to be future-funded led to a rejection by members of the transport committee.

SALGA concluded in their submission that a lot more work needs to be done on advising the public how e-tolling  works; advertising on why it is necessary; pricing structures to be seen visually on approach; what any alternative routes are; what the discounts are about and how and when to buy an e-tag and if it is always necessary.

SANRAL, who were present at both the hearings and subsequent debates accepted privately this advice given by SALGA to the satisfaction of the portfolio chairperson and although SANRAL had no speaking role in the subsequent legislative debate, once again their presence was felt.

Even the parliamentary portfolio committee admitted in conclusion when the Bill was approved that nobody really wanted e-tolling but were clearly angered by the OUTA and COSATU suggestion that “nobody was informed on the Bill” and even more curious to know why OUTA itself was nowhere to be seen in Cape Town.

Presumably the Bill will go to the National Assembly now that Parliament is re-assembling and concurrence eventually sought from the National Council of Provinces. Presumably also OUTA is hoping that the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the matter is now headed, will instruct the minister to withdraw the Bill.

Posted in Cabinet,Presidential, Finance, economic, Justice, constitutional, Trade & Industry, Transport0 Comments

Cabinet decides that e-tolling will proceed

In a cabinet statement this week cabinet made it clear by  approving the Transport Laws and Related Matters Amendment Bill for tabling in Parliament that the e-tolling development generally and particularly on the project known as the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP), was going ahead.

The heart of the matter remains the electronic toll collection system and the new Bill will give the South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL) the full enforcement powers it needs to ensure payment of tolls.     Between the new Bill, SANRALS’s own founding legislation and National Roads Act, all put together, allowed Ben Martins, minister of transport to consider that SANRAL will eventually be in  sufficient compliance to both enforce and administer e-tolling.

In a meeting a few weeks ago, the Urban Tolling Alliance (OUTA) and the newly formed Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) on the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP), OUTA all agreed that the national fuel levy continue to be used to fund freeway improvements since this was the established and fair procedure for road development.

The OUTA delegation included the South African Vehicle Rental and Lease Association, the Automobile Association, the South African National Consumer Union, Investment Solutions and the Retail Motor Industry, led by Wayne Duvenage.

Nobody disagreed on the need for users to pay for road improvements; the need to decongest the country’s roads; and the need for more efficient public transport but focus again fell on the method of funding use, i.e cameras on e-toll gantries whether e-tolling as a procedure would solve congestion.

OUTA welcomed the GFIP it said at the time and commended the South African National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) was a well-managed road building entity but argued that e-tolling was not efficient or effective as a funding mechanism in itself. Where OUTA disagreed was that the existing national fuel levy be used to fund freeway improvements in view of the current use of the levy to build and maintain roads countrywide.

Government has always stressed the need that whatever happens, users had to pay and and it appears that the ministry was far too far down the e-tolling contractual development of building to wish to alter its course, aside from any policy decisions on the matter.

Posted in Cabinet,Presidential, Finance, economic, Fuel,oil,renewables, Public utilities, Trade & Industry, Transport, Uncategorized0 Comments


This website is Archival

If you want your publications as they come from Parliament please contact ParlyReportSA directly. All information on this site is posted two weeks after client alert reports sent out.

Upcoming Articles

  1. Carbon Tax debate heats up in Parliament
  2. Copyright Bill goes into final stages
  3. Hate Crimes Bill on way back to Parliament
  4. DTI briefs Parliament on the road ahead
  5. RE-IPP4 alive again with LNG interest
  6. Competition Commission rough on investors

Earlier Editorials

Earlier Stories

  • AARTO licence demerit system studied  …. In what has been a legislative marathon, the update of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act (AARTO) has now reached a stage […]

  • SARS role at border posts being clarified …. In adopting the Border Management Authority (BMA) Bill, Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs agreed with a wording that at all future one-stop border […]

  • Modernising SAPO a culture change ….. sent to clients 27 February…. Stage by stage, Mark Barnes, Group Chief Executive Officer of South African Post Office (SAPO), appears to be reforming cultures and […]

  • OECD money task force waiting for SA   ….sent to clients Feb 7…. Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Finance, Yunus Carrim, made it quite clear in terms of parliamentary rules that […]

  • President Zuma vs Parliament on FICA Bill …..editorial……The convoluted thinking that is taking place in South Africa to avoid the consequences of the law has once again become evident in […]