Tag Archive | Ian Ollis

Poor showing from Department of Labour

sent to clients 6 October…..

Department roasted by MPs….. 

The Department of Labour (DOL) managed to spend 99% of the money allocated to it in the yearmildred-oliphant 2014/5, but in the same period achieved only 43% of its targets, according to the Auditor General (AG).

Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Labour in response has now requested that Minister Mildred Oliphant appear before the committee to explain a dismal track record for the department built up over five years.

The committee was studying its own parliamentary overview of the DOL annual report which presentation also included DOL’s first 2015/6 quarterly financial and tasking targets. The overview was prepared in the light of  the AG’s recent audit of the department.

No better than before

In the first quarter of 2015/6, it was noted by the parliamentary overview that performance was little better than a bad previous year, with DOL spending R778.8m of the annual R2.6bn budget in that quarter, reflecting an under-expenditure of R130m with performance against targets also no better despite complaints lodged last year by the parliamentary PC on Labour.

The position was evident after the committee’s parliamentary financial oversight researcher had analyised the Auditor General’s report on DOL’s figures and perfomance in conjunction with reports from the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPA) on the same subject, represented by Phelelani Dlomo of DPA.

Bad history

The sad litany of poor organisation, said Dlomo, went back to 2012 and the R880 000 misspent in a “fruitless and wasteful” manner when a labour imbizo was cancelled at the last minute “due to unforeseen circumstances” in Gauteng.   At no stage over the next 12 month, Dlomo showed, there was little evidence of any marked improvement.

Subsequent failures by the Department of Public Works to “produce invoices for the right year” for new buildings for DOL and failures with inspection and enforcement programmes on labour issues were subsequent reasons for the overall financial misfire. The excuses for underspending of budget in the current 2015/6 first quarter were “slow spending on stationery, office leases and travel, and unfilled but funded vacant positions.

Lumka YengeniChairperson Lumka Yengeni and the Committee were warned by the Parliamentary Legal Advisor that it could not touch upon the issue of the DOL strategic plans because such had been approved by Parliament but what needed to be investigated was the underperformance of employees, since it was at management level that the department was failing on a regular basis.

No show minister

Minister of Labour, Mildred Oliphant, has had a running battle with the main Opposition Party for some time now because of her regular non-appearance before the Portfolio Committee on Labour. In a reply to a tabled parliamentary question on her absence by Ian Ollis MP (DA) that she had “defied and not heeded requests to attend Parliament”, the Minister replied in writing that she had never received any formal invitation, request or summons to attend the Portfolio Committee meetings.

The statement from her Ministry added “there is nothing unusual in parliamentary practice when a Minister is represented by her director general on issues requiring answers on departmental operations and plans.”

“This is not the practice of most Ministers”, said Ollis and added that the majority of Ministers liked toian ollis attend so that they appeared in touch with their departments and are conversant with the issues that their departments.  Without a doubt, he said, this was not the case with the Minister of Labour “who obviously rejected any financial oversight of her department’s performance.”

How bad can it get

Ms. Meisie Nkau of the Auditor General’s office completely supported the parliamentary research and analysis findings undertaken and added “DOL was spending but underachieving”. Opposition members at question time had a field day and asked the auditor general’s office if “DOL was not perhaps the worst department in government”.

Ms. Nkau of the AG’s office replied the DOL was “not the worst department at meeting its targets” but asked all MPs to rather “measure performance of all government departments against the best.”

The questioner, Michael Bagraim of the DA, said that he also suspected corruption in the Compensation Fund and called for a specific report from the Auditor-General’s office on this as soon as possible.

Top down problems

Derrick America (DA) said the accounting officer, DOL, must be held accountable as well. There had been a lack of “consequence management” and what was now evident was the retrogressive nature of the DOL and its entities.

“The Minister must give this committee a commitment as to when action would be taken against non-performing senior managers, who were also tolerating under-performance from their juniors”, he said.

Other articles in this category or as background

Labour : nobody at top biting the bullet – ParlyReportSA

Labour committee ignores strikes – ParlyReportSA

Posted in Labour, LinkedIn, Special Recent Posts, Trade & Industry0 Comments

Labour relations bill rejected

LRA amendment on strike violence rejected….

ian ollisThe Portfolio Committee on Labour has rejected a Private Member’s Bill, the Labour Relations Amendment Bill proposed by Shadow Minister of Labour, Ian Ollis, to make provision for trade unions to be accountable in the event of violence, destruction of property and intimidation by union members during a protected strike.

The background to the Bill noted that “statistics from the protest action in the metal and engineering sector showed that in the first two weeks of that strike, 246 cases of intimidation, 50 violent ‘incidents’ and 85 cases of vandalism were recorded.

Duty to take reasonable steps

“The Bill seeks to provide a statutory duty on trade unions to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to persons and property within the Act”, said Ian Ollis MP, when tabling the Bill noting that his Bill had been stalled since 2010.

COSATU spokesperson Patrick Craven at the time responded with the statement that “COSATU will campaign relentlessly, thorough the alliance, in Parliament, at the Constitutional court and in the streets, to ensure that such a law is defeated.”\

Cabinet says we have the tools

Meanwhile, when President Zuma addressed the House in his State of Nation Address he condemned violence associated with strikes but said, “We have enough instruments in our labour relations machinery to resolve labour disputes.”

When presenting the Bill to Parliament in the current session, Ian Ollis said that the Bill could specify penalties, but also it envisaged a situation where the Labour Court is given permission to order parties, if a strike turned violent, to arbitration.

The Department of Labour (DoL) distanced itself from the Bill, Director-General, Thobile Lamati sayingThobile Lamati that these issues that were being addressed at NEDLAC level.

As a result of the meeting, a further Labour Portfolio Committee meeting heard the advice of Parliamentary Legal Adviser, Ms Noluthando Mpikashe, who told the Committee that although the Bill has no constitutional defects, existing legislation catered for all its contents.   She cited the Gatherings Act (Section 11) as a satisfactory answer and that the proposed Bill was pre-empting the NEDLAC deliberations.

Back to Marikana

Ollis responded that the Bill simply proposed that unions be held accountable for the conduct of their members during strike action. This will ensure not only accountability, but safety of the non-striking workers and added that “had the Bill been in place, lives would have been saved at Marikana.”

He complained “The Gatherings Act does not regulate any behaviour outside an approved gathering. The Bill before the Committee speaks to actions resulting from unapproved gatherings. The Bill also calls for the granting of permission to the Labour Court to force arbitration once a strike had turned violent,” he said.

He also complained in previous meetings that that the Opposition did not have a voice in NEDLAC. It could not give any input. The duty of the Opposition was to propose new ideas with regard to legislation, and the only way to reach NEDLAC was through the Portfolio Committee.

Bill voted out

Chairperson Yengeni rejected totally the claim that Opposition parties could not address NEDLAC directly. She said there were channels available to engage any entity of government.  She thanked Shadow Minister Ollis for his Bill and all the work that had gone into it but said “When the NEDLAC process is complete, the Committee will be the wiser”. Using its majority, ANC MPs rejected the Bill in its totality, the IFP abstaining.

Chairperson Lumka Yengeni stated afterwards, “The Bill is rejected by the Committee as it is not raising anything new. All its contents are captured in the Regulation of Gatherings Act,” she said. “The Department of Labour is on top of the situation”, she added.

Shadow Minister Ollis said, “The violence will continue. Therefore the current platform is inadequate.”

Other articles in this category or as background
Parliament delays process on Labour Relations Bill – ParlyReportSA
Muscle may be added to LRA – ParlyReportSA

Posted in Facebook and Twitter, Labour, LinkedIn, Security,police,defence, Special Recent Posts, Trade & Industry0 Comments

Muscle may be added to LRA

Feature article….

BS000318LRA needs beefing up, says DA ….

A political confrontation is no doubt about to occur and possibly street unrest regarding the parliamentary notice now gazetted tabling a Bill proposing changes to the Labour Relations Act (LRA).

It also proposes empowering  labour courts to declare the cessation of a protected strike or to refer the protected strike for arbitration in the event of riot damage.

Public comment to Parliament was allowable until December 7 on the Labour Relations Amendment Bill PMB2-2014, which DA MP, Ian Ollis, intends introducing a private member’s bill.

Responsibility for violence

The opening wording of the gazetted notice stated that notice of an intention to “amend the Labour Relations Act (No. 6 of 1995) to make provision for trade unions to be accountable in the event of violence, destruction of property and intimidation by union members during a protected strike, and comments are requested.”

The background to the Bill notes that “statistics from recent protest action in the metal and engineering sector show that in the first two weeks of the strike, 246 cases of intimidation, 50 violent ‘incidents’ and 85 cases of vandalism were recorded.”

Views of Cosatu

Cosatu spokesperson Patrick Craven said, in response to DA statements issued as result of the gazette being published, “COSATU will campaign relentlessly, thorough the alliance, in Parliament, at the Constitutional court and in the streets, to ensure that such a law is defeated.”

By “alliance”, Craven is presumably referring to factors such as whether ANC MPs will join ranks and vote against the Bill at portfolio committee level when introduced.   This meeting will not occur until at least February and March 2015.

It is to be noted that as a private member’s Bill, this Bill is not tabled by the minister of labour, nor is associated in any way to any draft or proposal emanating from the department of labour.

How to strike properly

 The Bill, as proposed, provides for the accountability of trade unions in the event of violence, destruction to property and intimidation by union members during a protected strike.  The legislation also requires unions to educate workers regarding violence and on labour law procedures before strikes and by law unions are to provide marshals for crowd control who have been

ian ollisOllis, who is shadow minister for labour, says that his Bill also proposes that “courts would be empowered to stop a strike that is  properly trained for such and “to prevent criminals infiltrating union ranks”.excessively violent by forcing the parties into arbitration, to declare a violent strike as unprotected and to award damages against unions that have not implemented  such processes.

Bill not needed

The proposals also state that courts would be empowered to award damages against unions that have not implemented the law’s required staff education and crowd marshal training.

Cosatu flatly rejects the Bill. Says Craven, “Cosatu has consistently opposed violence, intimidation and damage to property during strikes and demonstrations, all of which are offences under existing laws and therefore require no new law to deal with them.”

The difficulty is holding unions to account for violence, a matter which is being attempted to be defined by Ollis, outsiders asking whether laws passed by Parliament are the answer or the problem.

There also appears to be two arguments, or camps of thought, on violence associated with strike action in South Africa.  Many commentators and a wealth of labour lawyers and have pronounced upon these arguments and no doubt they will emerge in Parliament in more detail should the Bill get to the point of being debated.

Two views

The points seem to be the extent to which community poverty and frustration extend into the situation, whether the answer to solve violence exists in the workplace and whether the ability of any law to criminalise contraventions of labour relations tenets can work and if this is the answer.

The kind of frustration that is evident become obvious, as media reported, when a union member exclaimed during the NUMSA metalworkers strike, “If we settle the strike and we get back to work we can save our company and we won’t lose our houses and our cars.   Why on earth would we go to court and start fighting again, risk everything, to get maybe a little bit of money compared to losing all our belongings?” he asked.  This point is raised by Ollis.

But damage to property is the least of the problems, says UCT’s humanities dean, Sakhela Buhlungu, in a speech in Cape Town recently. “The real thing is the loss of lives. With damages, in fact the beneficiaries, if this Bill goes through, will be the people who own property.   It is the poor people who will be caught in the crossfire because they are viewed as  scabbing. How do you compensate those people?  Do you say the unions must pay for lost lives?  You can’t quantify that”, she told her audience.

Poverty driven

Clearly the violence is well outside the arena of whether collective bargaining is working or not but the one view is that it is another manifestation of community frustration amongst those living below the breadline.

Buhlungu said to her audience, “Look at domestic violence; it is out of control.  Look at child rape; it is out of control.  Look at violence by the police against the public; it is out of control.  Violence is so pervasive that, in fact, it would be a surprise if a strike were not violent.”   Clearly, she said, the passing of laws will not resolve such issues.

On the same side of the coin also is the pragmatic view noted by Graeme Simpson, renowned labour writer of many years who in 1994, the year of independence, wrote, “The potential of the workplace as an agency for social change is severely under-utilised, and the narrowly conceived strategies to insulate industrial relations thus actively undermine the potential for relative peace (in the workplace).”

In the context of the violent strikes at that time (Checkers etc), Simpson said, “The vision of most employers has remained rather conservatively limited to futile attempts to insulate or protect the workplace from encroaching violence, rather than engaging in any way with the origins of the problem beyond the factory gates.”

Township stress

Simpson noted that research conducted then by the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation had shown that community-based violence (whether political or criminal) and the trauma associated with victimisation and stress resulting from potential or indirect victimisation, had the effect of broadly polluting workplace relationships.

There is a vital need – with attendant advantages – for business and trade union leaders, said Simpson, to engage jointly in interactive planning to harness the potential of the working environment as a proactive arena of peaceful social change, whilst simultaneously addressing the concrete needs of the most victimised township communities in general.

In the meanwhile the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation has evolved a four-pronged approach, it says on its current website, for dealing with the impact of violence on industrial relations. These programmes include the idea that the workplace is a place where violence-related trauma can be treated and training must be given to support and counsel traumatised co-workers.

Bigger business role

Communication, says the Centre, to generate information and sensitivity to the shared problems of violence and their influence on industrial relations is much required and importantly all companies should engage in community development and upliftment involving violence monitoring and conflict resolution processes beyond the shop-floor.

Also the Centre sees as an imperative that there have to be more community development initiatives from all businesses with workforces where worker or community representatives are party to decisions on allocating resources for corporate social upliftment programmes.

The second camp of thought clearly see Marikana as a Rubicon that was crossed which has so totally changed the labour environment that labour courts must have more powers to administer their decisions and that it is the unions that must change. The Bill proposes changes by criminalising failure to adhere to such amendments to the Labour Relations Act or at least making perpetrators culpable. Enough is enough, is the thought pattern.

Said Ollis in a DA statement as the Bill was tabled in Parliament by the Speaker, “A law is needed to ensure that unions be held responsible for all conduct that could potentially cause foreseeable damage to property, result in injury or loss of life.”

“Members of the public and business owners should thus exercise their rights and hold unions accountable for damage to property resulting from strike action,” he concluded.

Round the corner from Parliament, JP Smith, who is responsible for safety and security on the Cape Town mayoral committee said angrily a week or so ago, when accounting for all the damage done by strikers was being accounted for, whether by union members, just frustrated poor people or Cape skollies, “It is about highlighting the individuals, prosecuting them, exposing them to the media. What we need is for actions to have consequences for individuals.”

President’s response

Meanwhile, when speaking in Parliament, President Zuma did indeed condemn the violence associated with the Numsa strike but he gave no indication that concern about violence would result in fundamental changes to policy or legislation, as proposed by Ollis.

“We have enough instruments in our labour relations machinery to resolve labour disputes,” said Zuma to the National Assembly.

According to Patrick Craven of Cosatu, the “draconian principle” of criminalizing unions by default ignores the fact that employers are also at fault and he sees the threat to award financial damages against a union as having the potential to bankrupt unions and force them to disband, “which is surely what the DA, and its friends in business, want”, he added.

Most discount this argument as an exaggeration although it might appeal to Craven’s own audience.

COSATU needs collective bargaining

Craven added that in Cosatu’s view by empowering courts to force employers and unions into arbitration where strikes are excessively violent, or declare such a strike unprotected “would give the state unparalleled power to undermine collective bargaining and the basic human right to withdraw one’s labour.”

The department of labour recently released its Annual Industrial Action Report and this makes for compelling reading, says Johan Botes, director at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, who no doubt will make submissions to Parliament on the subject of the new Bill.

“Most worrying,” notes Botes “is the fact that the percentage of unprotected strikes has increased from 2012 to 2013.   The report indicates that during 2012, 54% of strikes were protected whilst this number fell by 6% in 2013.”

“This may suggest a number of troublesome issues, including lack of regard for the law or the consequences of unlawful conduct, growing frustration and antipathy towards employers, or further support for the view that our collective bargaining processes and (SA labour) practices are in dire need of an overhaul.”

More jobs lost

Botes says it also worrisome that large groups of employees are being exposed to dismissal as result of their participation in unprotected industrial action whereas focus surely ought to be on how to save jobs and limit or prevent unnecessary dismissals.”

“The need for greater compliance with legal requirements before embarking on industrial action should be more emphasized, when considering the alarming reports of other unlawful activities connected with strikes, whether protected or unprotected, and which activities include assault, intimidation and causing damage to property,” he notes.

The ANC, as a party or alliance, has not made its views known at this stage on the Bill, nor any stance to be adopted by its party whips.
Ollis of the DA is convinced that Parliament must pass such an amendment to the LRA “where action could result in injury or loss of life”, thus ratcheting the parliamentary argument up a notch or two.

Fall back

Last word goes to the background of the Bill itself which states, “Though the Regulation of Gatherings Act 1993 the law imposes restrictions and prohibitions upon gatherings and demonstrations that cause “riot damage” to third parties, the current provisions within the legislation fail to address instances where damage caused to persons and property by strikers in the course of promoting the objects of the strike and which does not necessarily occur within the structures of a gathering or demonstration.”

Ollis says, “Indeed, harm caused by strikers often occurs underhandedly at strike-breakers’ homes and as strike participants move to and from strike locations – violence and damage to persons and property therefore occurring outside the formal strictures of a sanctioned strike or gathering, yet acting in furtherance of union-supported collective action.”

He concludes, “This Bill thus seeks to provide a statutory duty on trade unions to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to persons and property within the Act.”
Other articles in this category or as background
http://parlyreportsa.co.za/labour/labour-committee-turns-away-strikes/
http://parlyreportsa.co.za/labour/labour-relations-act-changes-passed/
http://parlyreportsa.co.za/bee/rumblings-in-labour-circles-on-bee/

Posted in Facebook and Twitter, Labour, LinkedIn, Mining, beneficiation, Trade & Industry0 Comments

Bumpy road for e-tolling Bill continues

E-tolling finally makes it through Parliament…

Discontent was expressed once again regarding the Transport and Related Matters Bill regarding e-tolling when opposition members complained that the Bill had been classified as Section 75 for national competence only, therefore denying the National Council of Provinces the process under section 76 of the Constitution whereby the Bill and its contents could be debated and approved at provincial level.

Johannes Makgatho, department of transport, told parliamentarians of the select  committee on transport, NCOP, that when the South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL) Act was promulgated, electronic toll collection (ETC) was not envisaged in its current form. The development of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP) had necessitated ETC and the Bill was necessary.

Sanral goes big on bonds

road tollsThe Bill was described by DoT as being of vital importance for the collection of tolls, the lack of which would have a negative impact on the ability of government to raise capital for their infrastructure projects. SANRAL had issued bonds to the tune of R24bn and the inability to collect tolls to repay the bonds would imperil the state guarantee provided to SANRAL, Makgatho said.

Ms Suraya Williams, Principal Law Advisor from the Office of the State Law Advisors, told the committee that that the regular ‘substantial measure’ test was applied to the question of whether the Bill should be tagged under section 76 for provincial debate but according to this established constitutional process, the Bill had been found to be a Section 75 Bill.

Who has heard of Cross Border Agency?

The Democratic Alliance said that it did not object to e-tolling in principle but considered there was a lack of public participation on the project and the process of e-tolling as a whole and this was unacceptable. Also all funds were to be collected by a body known  as the Cross-Border Road Transport Agency, which they said was a relatively unknown entity and were deeply concerned that this body was competent.

The DA added that this state entity had already been found unable to handle its own finances and got into difficulties handling just cross-border taxi industry matters. Mr Alex van Niekerk, Manager of the Gauteng Freeway Project for SANRAL, said the Cross-Border Agency had indeed experienced much difficulty initially with vehicles entering the country and travelling on roads which had not been tolled, but they had now built up experience with e-tolling and were ready for GFIP and national e-tolling as it built up.

Like cellphones

Mr van Niekerk explained that e-tolling would replace conventional toll plazas and that tolls would be recorded electronically in reference to barcodes which recorded the type and status of the vehicle in the same manner as prepaid airtime on cell phones. Existing toll plazas would remain but rather than manual payments, the plaza would read the tag and give access if there was credit on the account.

He said the principle of tolling did not change at all, only the mechanism of tolling changed and “non-compliance at the time of travel could therefore be remedied after the fact.” No profit, he added, would be made by SANRAL in the collection of toll revenue and he added that technology for the GFIP was considered “cutting edge”.

The Bill has now achieved NCOP concurrence and has gone forward for final reading. It then goes to President Zuma for assent.
The following articles are archived on this subject:

 http://parlyreportsa.co.za//finance-economic/transport-laws-bill-on-e-tolling-amended/
http://parlyreportsa.co.za//cabinetpresidential/outa-goes-to-supreme-court-of-appeal-against-bill/

Posted in Finance, economic, Public utilities, Trade & Industry, Transport0 Comments

Parliament not satisfied with road death figures

 

Road death numbers not adding up

An opposition motion for clarification by the minister of transport, Ben Martins, on apparent discrepancies in road deaths reported by the ministry of transport has led to a call by the portfolio committee on transport for the minister to meet with parliamentarians to try and establish the reason for what is suspected to have been a major increase in mortality numbers according to recent figures given.

Iian ollisn a letter from Ian Ollis MP (DA), addressed to the chairperson of the transport committee Ruth Bhengu, it was pointed out that “the recent road death toll figures released by the Minister of Transport, Mr Ben Martins, raise serious concerns which require the immediate attention of the portfolio committee on transport. The figures given in the recent annual strategy and budget report of the department of transport indicate a substantial increase over the previous year.”

It was also pointed out that there were discrepancies between the figures released by the department of transport on annual figures generally and studies done by the National Institute of Mortality Studies and the Medical Research Council both in 2012.

Reasons requested

The motion went on to say that the minister “should report on the reason for the increase in road deaths; the estimation of the correct figures; the successes and challenges of current road safety campaigns and what was being done to address South Africa’s poor ranking by World Health Organization (WHO) on the subject.”

Other members of the committee asked whether the high rate of road mortality and thus South Africa’s poor ranking, was the result of road infrastructure collapse, the recklessness of drivers, or a combination of this and other issues.

Chairperson Bhengu said that a specific answer had to come from the minister on these issues and she wanted to know from the department of transport as well on the question of transport of schoolchildren. She was aware that in some instances children “were crammed onto bakkies” and this was lethal, she added.

A reply is expected from the minister shortly.

Associated articles archived
http://parlyreportsa.co.za//finance-economic/all-not-well-in-the-trucking-industry-2/
http://parlyreportsa.co.za//public-utilities/aarto-amendment-bill-gives-back-up-to-road-law/

Posted in Public utilities, Trade & Industry, Transport0 Comments

All not well in the trucking industry

Call that corruption exists

trucksIn answer to a call made by the portfolio committee on transport on the state of the trucking industry in South Africa, it became evident from responses by the department of transport (DoT); from the Road Freight Association (RFA) and examples given by an independent small operator, that large truckers dominated in an industry in an unfair manner that was rife with corruption.

Mawethu Vilana, deputy director-general DoT, said that going back to 2002/3, the department had begun an exercise to look at how to provide opportunities and also broaden the space for participation by smaller operators in the road freight sector. It became clear that smaller entrants lacked finance; that an “unscrupulous broking sector was part of the industry” and generally there was a lack of skills and know-how in the trucking industry generally due to poor provision of training facilities and an industry which was undercapitalised except but a few large operators.

DOT not playing proper role

Vilana admitted that when it came to black empowerment opportunities, the main player was the department of trade and industrydot logo (DTI) and not DoT, DTI having the BEE verification control system in their court, DoT playing virtually no part in either reform of the industry or the development of SMME’s.

On the subject of crime, little could be done about bribery and corruption, Vilana admitted under questioning by parliamentarians, unless legislation was beefed up with proper powers and a full, properly constituted investigation carried out into the industry.

Road users must pay

roadsHe also admitted that permit fees were high because of the principle of “user pays” which had been adopted by government “since road truckers caused great damage to the road system.”

Gavin Kelly, RFA said his association had 385 members, with 109 affiliates and 40 associates representing different levels of possible enforcement and ability to develop skills and training but complained of massive permit fees (the last being 412%); large levels of corruption amongst government officers and no value being added by the government’s road agency to the industry in general.

RFA also stated that there appeared to be no proper government road freight strategy and single government officials determined policy without ministerial approval.    Kelly said “no real consultation exists between the state road agency and the industry” and it was the RFA view that DoT “was just going through the motions.”

Trucking group says market closed

One medium sized operator, Tramarco, said that despite heavy investment in trucks and bearing in mind the “ever rising price of

tramarco site

tramarco site

fuel”, it was almost impossible to break into the transport business to obtain long-term “tangible” contracts from major mining groups and state utilities.   They appeared to feel “safer” using old contacts and larger companies and quite clearly favours were being granted, they said.

Their spokesman said that the entire industry was dominated by a number of large trucking groups and smaller entrants were effectively “locked out” of the industry because the industry was either not regulated properly.

AARTO somewhat dubious

They also said the licensing AARTO system was not working properly; there was a lack of legislative enforcement; too many corrupt officials had too much power and there appeared a lack of interest by large companies generally to uplift smaller operators, little interest in encouraging training and building the trucking job market.

Tramarco said that no favours or finance was called for by the medium and small sized companies but merely a fair chance to compete for tenders.   They called on government to provide leverage within its own government departments, state utilities and with industry to break up monopolistic habits and encourage more black empowerment opportunities.

“Large groups and utilities make lots of statements on freeing up the market but nothing happens”, Tramarco said.

MPs demand better skills development

MPs demanded of DoT that concrete steps be taken to assist small entrepreneurs and to provide proof of a record in the area of skills development. “It was clear that little had been done by the DoT in this area”, said one ANC member.

Opposition members said they were convinced that DoT “had no meaningful understanding of what the situation was on the ground.” One MP said the City of Cape Town had provided a solution by cutting the bigger contracts into smaller parts, supplying smaller quantities and increasing the number of entrants slowly. He called on DoT to start thinking of similar solutions on a national scale.

Roads to nowhere

Ruth BhenguChairperson Ruth Bhengu told DoT that the meeting had been called because an examples had been given to parliamentarians whereby “large companies gave small companies short-term contracts and rates that would not take them anywhere and businesses that were desperate could not only pay for their trucks but could not maintain them, the business going ‘broke’ as a result”.

There was also an immoral business broking sector emerging, she felt.

Vilana of DoT said there was nothing government could do to protect such entrepreneurs and that this was the nature of the industry which was high capital risk with a road system that was deteriorating.

The committee found this all very unsatisfactory and called for further meetings with DoT stating that these matters had to be resolved and that the challenges facing the trucking industry were to be investigated further. Also cross-parliamentary meetings with public enterprises and trade and industry committees were to be called. DoT was told it would be re-called for further reports.

Further archived references

http://parlyreportsa.co.za//public-utilities/aarto-amendment-bill-gives-back-up-to-road-law/

http://parlyreportsa.co.za//finance-economic/transport-laws-bill-on-e-tolling-amended/

Posted in Finance, economic, Mining, beneficiation, Public utilities, Security,police,defence, Transport0 Comments

Transport Laws Bill on e-tolling amended

Public disclosure written into Bill….

road tollsProposed amendments to the e-tolling Transport Laws and Related Matters Bill affecting alternative routes which are used to avoid or by-pass tolling systems – amendments originally proposed by the Freedom Front Plus (FF+) and subsequently amended by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and which vitally affect public disclosure – have been accepted by the parliamentary committee on transport and will be incorporated in the final Bill to be presented to the National Assembly for approval.

The Bill as originally tabled makes the proposition of e-tolling legally acceptable on a national basis. However, in a subsequent move, published proposals came forward from the FF+ to the effect that all socio-economic reports and traffic impact assessments compiled on alternative routings must be made available to the province concerned and every municipality affected before any e-tolling project can commence.

Alternative routes get heavy use

The FF+ proposal was on the basis that a considerable number of small towns and local governments have been badly affected by heavy traffic, where heavily used by-pass routes, now required by law, have been picked to obviate the necessity of paying e-toll fees.  Lower grade roads have sometimes been made impassable and even bridging damaged.

On the basis of the FF+ request, the necessary proposals were published but during the process of adoption it was pointed out by the DA that such amendments were still not acceptable. Whilst the principle was right, they said, the amendment was insufficient since no guarantee was provided on public consultation or public involvement, particularly in the case of the affected parties.

 

No chance to hide

Ian Ollis, shadow minister of transport said, “What happens if a provincial officer or somebody at local government level, maybe even somebody who has a vested interest fails to disclose the reports or impact assessments or even hides them in a drawer?”, he asked. The case of OUTA was a case in point, he said.

After debate with the state law advisor, the DA’s additional proposal that all such reports on socio economic factors and all impact assessments involving matters regarding e-tolling were to be published in the government gazette for public consumption, was accepted.

The Bill will now go forward to the NCOP for approval.

Posted in Finance, economic, Trade & Industry, Transport0 Comments


This website is Archival

If you want your publications as they come from Parliament please contact ParlyReportSA directly. All information on this site is posted two weeks after client alert reports sent out.

Upcoming Articles

  1. MPRDA : Shale gas developers not satisfied
  2. Environmental Bill changes EIAs
  3. Border Mangement Bill grinds through Parliament

Earlier Editorials

Earlier Stories

  • Anti Corruption Unit overwhelmed

    Focus on top down elements of patronage  ….editorial….As Parliament went into short recess, the Anti-Corruption Unit, the combined team made up of SARS, Hawks, the National Prosecuting Authority and Justice Department, divulged […]

  • PIC comes under pressure to disclose

    Unlisted investments of PIC queried…. When asked for information on how the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) had invested its funds, Dr  Daniel Matjila, Chief Executive Officer, told parliamentarians that the most […]

  • International Arbitration Bill to replace BITs

    Arbitration Bill gets SA in line with UNCTRAL ….. The tabling of the International Arbitration Bill in Parliament will see ‘normalisation’ on a number of issues regarding arbitration between foreign companies […]

  • Parliament rattled by Sizani departure

    Closed ranks on Sizani resignation….. As South Africa struggles with the backlash of having had three finance ministers rotated in four days and news echoes around the parliamentary precinct that […]

  • Protected Disclosures Bill: employer to be involved

    New Protected Disclosures Bill ups protection…. sent to clients 21 January……The Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Affairs will shortly be debating the recently tabled Protected Disclosures Amendment Bill which proposes a duty […]